3-D films are being used only for profit by film distributors.

The culture of cinema was originally to watch a beautiful story being told on the big screen so that people can get their minds off of hard times and not to be in risk of serious health eye issues.

Resident Evil: Apocalypse, which was released in 2010 was hyped up a lot because of it’s 3-D feature, but it wasn’t much of an impact because it was still a terrifyingly bad movie.

The Lion King was brought to the big screen and didn’t have any difference that was brought into the story. Basically, they are all just cheesy 3-D tricks.

The only good part of it is the fact that they are bringing back their classics onto the big screen so that a younger generation can watch.

Is Disney really doing this for money supremacy or because they really want to reintroduce their classics? Who knows and who cares.

Most of the 3-D effects are not necessary for when the monkey raises Simba into his future kingdom or when the beast dances around with Belle.

The same exists in any romance 3-D film. Nobody really want to see person kissing passionately in 3D.

I honestly don’t remember when a film made me want to lean my head back because of a 3-D effect. It dosen’t usually cause much reaction other than me saying, it must have been expensive to make that effect happen.

The worst 3-D film still has to be Jackass 3D. Who really needs to see a bunch of guys doing ridiculously hilarious and absurd things in 3D? That’s disgusting, not cool.

3-D films might be revolutionary, but for the wrong reasons. Let’s get back to the movie theatre for the beautiful cinematic story telling reasons and not just for the eye-popping lameness.