Once again men are deciding what women should do with their bodies, if you don’t have a uterus mind your business.
With the new Texas abortion law sign by Greg Abbott, which bans abortions past six weeks, women’s reproductive rights are in jeopardy again. The law came into effect on Sept. 1 and concluded that an abortion can not take place once a heartbeat is detectable in a fetus.
Most women don’t even have pregnancy symptoms until they are five or six weeks pregnant or confuse them with period symptoms since they are extremely similar and find out later than that. By then it is already too late to have an abortion in Texas.
Abortion has always been a hot topic and once again it seems we take one step forward and many steps back.
The United States’ ruling of Roe v. Wade states that in the first trimester of pregnancy the state may not regulate the abortion decision, the second trimester, the state may impose regulations on abortion that are reasonably related to maternal health and in the third trimester, once the fetus reaches the point of “viability,” a state may regulate abortions or prohibit them entirely.
The Roe v. Wade case was also because of abortion laws in Texas in 1973, you would think they learned their lesson the first time, but instead, they found a loophole.
They are using civil lawsuits to go after women who want or have abortions. The reasoning behinds this being okay, the Pro-life movement, but are they really Pro-life or Pro-birth?
Pro-lifers believe that abortion is morally and religiously wrong, and support the prohibition or restrictions of abortion.
There are people that are pro-life for themselves but believe that women should have the right to choose what is right for them. However, they also believe that there should be restrictions on when you can get an abortion.
According to NPR/PBS Newshour/Marist Poll, three-quarters of Americans say they prefer the court upholds Roe v. Wade.
The poll also shows that 72 percent of Americans want some sort of restriction on abortion, but not to outright ban it.
The main problem is that all pro-lifers are framed as people that do not want to give women the choice at all but those are Pro-birthers.
Someone who is pro-birth only cares about the fetus until it is born and becomes a baby. They claim to care about the children and want to protect them while inside their mother but once they are out into the world forget about them.
They believe a woman should give birth even if the baby is stillborn or will have life-threatening birth defects, even if the mother is at risk of death continuing the pregnancy. This is dangerous for women who may not be able to carry a child to term.
They claim to be pro-life but only want to regulate what a woman is allowed to do with her uterus.
They will argue for a fetus’ rights but ignore the children in foster care and the children in poverty going hungry in the country claiming it’s not their fault they aren’t their parents and can’t help them And look down on the government using taxpayer money to them.
If you are really pro-life you would care about the children who are breathing, living and eating on their own without draining and depending on their mother’s body for its survival like a parasite depends on its host.
Women don’t make the decision to have an abortion lightly, although it is not childbirth there is still trauma the body goes through and mental trauma as well.
The United States needs to take notes from other countries, take Mexico for example.
Mexico is a conservative catholic country where it has been ruled unconstitutional to criminalize abortion. The reasoning for the law being passed on can be attributed to the amount of tragedy taking place all over the country. Women were inducing miscarriages and having clandestine abortions resulting in death.
Abortion laws have nothing to do with religion. Mexico is proof of that, about 80% of the population in Mexico identifies as Catholic.
Women and anyone who assisted them in an abortion according to the Texas Law could risk facing charges and serve time in jail. Disheartening to victims of sexual assault and minors.
It would be lacking in compassion for a victim of sexual assault to keep an unwanted pregnancy. A child should not have to carry that fetus to term either, it is dangerous.
The youngest reported birth in the United States was done by a 5-year-old. She required a cesarean section because her pelvis was too small.
The complications that come with a teen pregnancy are plenty. A child could be born with low weight, and the mother can undergo complications while pregnant and while giving birth. There are also a number of health problems associated with perinatal outcomes and an increased risk for perinatal death. A teen mom is likely to develop anemia, low blood pressure, and have a premature birth.
Abortions are done to protect women. Protecting the life of an unborn human should not be prioritized over the person carrying them to term. It is also a woman’s choice whether or not she would like to have an abortion, it is a right that should not be taken from her.
The argument of whether an abortion should be legal is not about pro-life or pro-choice, it is an important decision where the government should not have total control in what a woman’s reproductive rights are.
The government’s responsibility is to provide aid, protection, and support to its citizens not persecute them for seeking healthcare.
Name (Requiered) • Nov 25, 2022 at 1:26 pm
Wanna share my comment about this post can i?
Allen Forsythe • Sep 23, 2021 at 1:53 pm
Thank you Jazmin, Robert and Lily for your editorial opinion regarding abortion.
In my early years I was pro-choice because I thought it made sense that a woman should have the option to choose to abort a human fetus inside her body provided certain reasonable conditions are met. Then I took a college biology lab class and during a break, I saw aborted human fetuses with fingers and toes preserved in jars of formaldehyde on the shelves in the room and from that moment on I have been pro-innocent life.
In my opinion, my body, my choice doesn’t apply because although a fetus is inside a pregnant person’s body it is not part of the pregnant person’s body. Rita Joseph, author of “Human Rights and the Unborn Child,” explains why the original “viability test” for an unborn child invented by Justice Harry Blackmun is in itself unconstitutional. It has no basis in the Constitution, and is in fact a throwback to a discredited and barbaric medieval practice called “trial by ordeal.”
In December, the Supreme Court will take up a case that could significantly affect, even overturn, Roe v. Wade. It involves deciding whether all pre-viability abortion prohibitions are unconstitutional. Perhaps, while we are waiting for the Supreme Court to keep or modify Roe v. Wade, you could see the movie Unplanned. Maybe you will be transformed like I was during my college biology class, maybe not. The choice is yours.
Socorro Forsythe • Sep 20, 2021 at 2:32 pm
Life is precious and I’m pro innocent life! In case you didn’t know, there were some female legislatures and even a few Democrats who voted for the Texas Heartbeat Act which does permit abortions in Texas after a heartbeat is detected for medical emergencies (please review the 10th amendment of the US Constitution). If a person in Texas wanted to have an abortion after a heartbeat is detected without a medical emergency and met certain conditions she could go to almost any other state in the United States or country to have the abortion . A pregnant person in Texas could also choose to have the baby and then give it to a qualified family member or adoption agency. I don’t know what Brett Kavanaugh or Covid Vaccinations or a Republican Elephant have to do with voluntary on demand abortions frequently paid for by taxpayers.
“I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born.”
― Ronald Reagan
“It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish.”
― Mother Theresa of Calcutta
“I feel the greatest destroyer of peace today is ‘Abortion’, because it is a war against the child… A direct killing of the innocent child, ‘Murder’ by the mother herself… And if we can accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love… And we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts…”
― Mother Teresa of Calcutta
I certainly supported a woman’s right to choose, but to my mind the time to choose was before, not after the fact.”
― Ann B. Ross, Miss Julia Throws a Wedding